When Faith Loses Balance — From Legalism to Romanticism

Introduction

True religion, at its heart, is about relationship — a living bond between the human and the divine, between love and reason, between law and spirit. But very often, that relationship loses balance. Sometimes faith becomes dry and lifeless, wrapped in rules and regulations; at other times, it melts into excessive emotion.

This struggle is not new. It began long before Christianity and continues even today — from ancient Judaism to modern Hindu Bhakti. What began as an intimate relationship with God slowly turned, in different ways, into systems of performance or sentiment. My reflections are not scholarly theories; they are just a layman’s attempt to understand how something so alive can sometimes become lifeless, and how devotion can swing between two extremes — legalism and romanticism.

From Relationship to Legalism

When a relationship breaks, law takes over. And when sentiment goes unchecked, reason gets sidelined. Both extremes spoil the balance.

In the Old Testament, God gave His people the Law — not to enslave them, but to guide them in living faithfully with Him. Over time, however, the Law became a heavy burden, burdened further by numerous additional rules. This caused religion to sometimes be reduced to mere rule-following rather than living in genuine relationship with God. The Apostle Paul, reflecting on this, wrote in 2 Corinthians 3:6, “The letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.” This contrasts the Old Covenant’s external law (“the letter”) which exposes sin but brings condemnation, with the New Covenant of the Spirit which brings true and transformative life.¹

Jesus did not come to throw away the Law but to bring it back to its real meaning — love, mercy, and life. But history shows how easily faith slides back into legalism. Christianity, which began as a personal relationship with the living Christ, slowly became an institution.

As one old saying goes:

“In Jerusalem it became a fellowship,
In Greece, a philosophy,
In Rome, an institution,
In Europe, a culture,
In Germon, a [systematic] theology
In America, an enterprise.”²

Faith must always express itself in life and community, but when law replaces love, theology turns cold. Legalism kills the spirit of devotion.

The Indian Parallel: Bhakti and Romanticism

If the West struggled with legalism, India sometimes faces the opposite — losing depth in the flood of emotion. Hinduism beautifully unites Jnana (knowledge), Karma (action), and Bhakti (devotion). When all three walk together, faith remains whole. But when Bhakti takes over as mere emotion, devotion can slip into sentimentality.

Many Western scholars, weary of the dryness of institutional religion, were fascinated by Bhakti’s warmth. They came to India, learned Sanskrit and Tamil, studied the lives of saints, and wrote excellent books. Their contribution was great — yet, some of them went too far, seeing Bhakti not as disciplined devotion but as romantic escape.

As Professor Edwin Bryant rightly says:

“If you take the position that myth and story are just fanciful, you’ve effectively erased 90% of Hinduism. Real life Hinduism, on the ground, is devotion.”³

For most Hindus, myths are not fiction — they are living stories that reveal truth through imagination. Hinduism recognizes not just seeing and reasoning, but also shruti — revelation — as a valid way of knowing.⁴ That’s why its faith is both poetic and philosophical.

Yet, it is important to clarify a common misunderstanding: sometimes reason is dismissed as a purely Western instrument hostile to devotion. This is not accurate. The Indian philosophical tradition has always embraced reason, albeit framed through its own concepts such as Pramana (valid means of knowledge), Tarka (logical reasoning), and Nyaya (systematic inquiry). While the exact English word “Reason” may not appear traditionally, the intellectual rigor and rational discourse have been central to Indian spirituality and philosophy since the Vedic and Upanishadic eras.

Hence, rejecting reason as merely a Western rationalist imposition overlooks the rich Indian heritage that carefully balances devotion with disciplined inquiry. The integration of devotion and rational thought is not contradictory but complementary, as clearly seen in texts like the Bhagavad Gita where Jnana, Karma, and Bhakti coexist in harmonious spiritual practice.⁹

When devotion turns into performance or mere emotion for its own sake, the essence is lost. Bhakti was never meant to be sentimentalism; it is love expressed through surrender, carefully balanced with wisdom and discernment.

Mythology: Story as Spiritual Language

Professor R.D. Ranade once made a striking comment:

 “Stories came first; the gods came later.”⁵

That may sound simple, but it reveals a deep truth — mythology was humanity’s first way of expressing the mystery of life. Myths are not lies; they are symbols through which people express realities beyond logic.

As De Smet and Neuner put it, “Mythology is not a discovery but a search — a projection of man’s inner longings.”⁶ The village Hindu who worships his kuladeivam (family god) or gramadevata (village deity) often knows that these gods were once heroic ancestors or protectors, remembered and raised to divine status.⁷

Myth, therefore, is not about historical proof but relational truth. It connects human experience with the divine presence in everyday life. Even Nehru, not exactly a theologian, admitted, “Facts and fiction are so interwoven as to be inseparable; this imagined history becomes symbolically true.”⁸

The real problem comes when people go to extremes — either insisting that every myth must be literal history or dismissing them all as fantasy. The truth of myth lies not in archaeology but in meaning — in how it reveals the human search for God.

Between Legalism and Romanticism

Faith loses its vitality when the heart and mind stop walking together. One side freezes into rules; the other melts into emotion. Jesus warned against the first; Indian saints warned against the second.

Devotion without understanding becomes emotion. Theology without love becomes judgment. The ideal faith integrates both — heart and head, love and law, spirit and sense.

Some modern seekers, especially in popular Bhakti movements, sometimes forget this. The joy and enthusiasm are beautiful, but when expression overtakes depth, devotion becomes showmanship. True Bhakti, as the saints taught, is quiet, humble, and self-giving — not noisy or sentimental.

Conclusion

Whenever faith loses balance, it either becomes law without life or love without direction. Law must be warmed by love, and love must be guided by wisdom.

Whether it’s Jesus correcting legalism in Judaism or Indian saints refining emotional devotion, the message is the same: true religion is a relationship, not a system or a sentiment.

Faith is not about defending doctrines or displaying emotions. It is about maintaining that living bond with the Eternal — where reason and reverence, knowledge and devotion, head and heart flow together like two banks of the same river.

Ashram, November 2, 2025

Footnotes

1. Apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians 3:6; a Pauline contrast between the legalistic observance of the Old Covenant and the life-giving power of the Spirit in the New Covenant.
2. Adapted from early Christian reflections on Church institutionalization.
3. Edwin Bryant, “Are Hindu Gods Mythological or Real?” (Vedanta Society of New York, 2025). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yP2dy_ZBPU
4. Bryant, ibid.; discussion on pramanas — perception, inference, and revelation.
5. R.D. Ranade, A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy (Poona Oriental Book Agency, 1926), p.3.
6. R. De Smet & J. Neuner, Religious Hinduism (Oxford, 1997), p.117.
7. Vijay Nath, Puraanas and Acculturation (Munshiram Manoharlal, 2001), Preface, p.xi.
8. Jawaharlal Nehru, The Discovery of India (1946), cited in Shashi Tharoor, Why I Am a Hindu (2019), p.246.
9. Reflection based on Indian philosophical concepts of Pramana, Tarka, and the integrative synthesis of Jnana, Karma, and Bhakti in the Bhagavad Gita and other Hindu texts (analysis adapted from Indian philosophy sources).

---

Bibliography

• Bryant, Edwin. Are Hindu Gods Mythological or Real? Vedanta Society of New York lecture, 2025.
• Ranade, R.D. A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy. Poona Oriental Book Agency, 1926.
• De Smet, R., & Neuner, J. Religious Hinduism. Oxford University Press, 1997.
• Nath, Vijay. Puraanas and Acculturation. Munshiram Manoharlal, 2001.
• Nehru, Jawaharlal. The Discovery of India. 1946.
• Tharoor, Shashi. Why I Am a Hindu. 2019.
• Bhagavad Gita (classical Indian scripture for doctrinal framework on Jnana, Karma, Bhakti).

Summary of Prof. Edwin Bryant’s Video

Title: “Are Hindu Gods Mythological or Real?” (Vedanta Society of New York, Oct 19, 2025)youtube​

Main Themes:

• Bryant begins by explaining how Western philosophical categories like “mythos” and “logos” shaped perceptions of divinity, eventually relegating mythos—narratives about gods—to non-historical status in Western thought. This mindset entered Christian theology through Platonic and Aristotelian rationalism, eventually leading Christians to reject anthropomorphic (bodied) images of God, despite scriptural accounts of Yahweh as a physical being.
• He explores how the term “idol” carries loaded meanings in Abrahamic contexts, often negatively influencing perceptions of Hindu deities and practices when viewed through Western religious and philosophical lenses.
• Bryant explains Indian epistemology’s three main “pramanas” (means of knowledge): direct perception (pratyaksha), inference (anumana), and scriptural testimony (shabda or shruti). He notes that inference and empiricism have limits—especially regarding non-material realities, like divine forms—which cannot be established empirically but are affirmed in Hindu texts via revelation.
• Bryant discusses the complex metaphysical positions of Indian traditions like Vaishnavism and Vedanta, which argue for the possibility of non-material, divine bodies. He contrasts this with the materialist presuppositions in Western traditions that assume all bodies must be made of matter, thus negating divinity embodied in form.
• He concludes that much of Hindu devotional practice—Bhakti, pilgrimage, deity worship—centers on a “bodied” understanding of divinity, which Western theology largely abandoned after the 5th century. Vaishnava Vedanta offers an alternative, where God’s body may be non-material and transcendent.

Key Quote (Bryant):
Bryant observes: “If you take that [Western rationalist] position, you’ve just eradicated 90% of Hinduism. The mass of Hinduism is basically by stories. Real life Hinduism, on the ground, is devotion.”youtube​