In a heated debate on Vijay TV’s ‘Neeya Naana’ program on May 8, 2011, the discussion centered around ‘free gifts and subsidies’, with a particular focus on education. The ‘against’ campaign argued that until the advent of British rule in India, education was pursued rather than provided universally. They highlighted that even after independence, education was not predominantly managed by the government but by philanthropists and local communities who established schools and colleges.
Conversely, the ‘for’ campaign criticized the limitations of such philanthropic efforts, noting that they often neglected marginalized and backward classes, benefiting primarily the higher castes.
Both sides presented valid arguments. However, neither addressed a crucial point: in pre-British India, education was pursued for the sake of knowledge and community needs, not primarily to secure employment. Education was viewed as ‘vidya’—a pursuit of wisdom—rather than merely a means to acquire information as is common in today’s educational system. Exceptions persist, such as Brahmin-run Gurukulams, which train religious specialists like priests and scholars, and are considered a form of ‘vidya’. Similarly, land and endowments (Brahmadeyas) were provided by kings and wealthy individuals to support such institutions.
These educational institutions were not geared towards earning certificates for employment in government or private sectors but were considered ‘vidyalaya’ (vidya + alaya = temple), where the emphasis was on acquiring knowledge rather than vocational training.
The East India Company introduced certificate-oriented education, which the British government continued to produce clerks (babus) to assist in administration. To provide fair and accurate critiques of past systems, it’s essential to consider these historical contexts and avoid biases. As Mahatma Gandhi aptly stated, “Cool judgment and a dispassionate and impartial inquiry are essential to a right view of the whole matter.” —Letter to “The Natal Advertiser”, September 29, 1893, in *Collected Works of Gandhiji*. Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India (1958), Third ed. Reprint 1994. Vol. I, p. 63.
Dayanand Bharati
Gurukulam, May 10, 2011
In a heated debate on Vijay TV’s ‘Neeya Naana’ program on May 8, 2011, the discussion centered around ‘free gifts and subsidies’, with a particular focus on education. The ‘against’ campaign argued that until the advent of British rule in India, education was pursued rather than provided universally. They highlighted that even after independence, education was not predominantly managed by the government but by philanthropists and local communities who established schools and colleges.
Conversely, the ‘for’ campaign criticized the limitations of such philanthropic efforts, noting that they often neglected marginalized and backward classes, benefiting primarily the higher castes.
Both sides presented valid arguments. However, neither addressed a crucial point: in pre-British India, education was pursued for the sake of knowledge and community needs, not primarily to secure employment. Education was viewed as ‘vidya’—a pursuit of wisdom—rather than merely a means to acquire information as is common in today’s educational system. Exceptions persist, such as Brahmin-run Gurukulams, which train religious specialists like priests and scholars, and are considered a form of ‘vidya’. Similarly, land and endowments (Brahmadeyas) were provided by kings and wealthy individuals to support such institutions.
These educational institutions were not geared towards earning certificates for employment in government or private sectors but were considered ‘vidyalaya’ (vidya + alaya = temple), where the emphasis was on acquiring knowledge rather than vocational training.
The East India Company introduced certificate-oriented education, which the British government continued to produce clerks (babus) to assist in administration. To provide fair and accurate critiques of past systems, it’s essential to consider these historical contexts and avoid biases. As Mahatma Gandhi aptly stated, “Cool judgment and a dispassionate and impartial inquiry are essential to a right view of the whole matter.” —Letter to “The Natal Advertiser”, September 29, 1893, in *Collected Works of Gandhiji*. Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India (1958), Third ed. Reprint 1994. Vol. I, p. 63.
Dayanand Bharati
Gurukulam, May 10, 2011
Leave a Reply